

SHOGHI EFFENDI'S INTENTIONS FOR MASON REMEY'S FUTURE
My Haifa Notes of 30 November 1952 reveal the following significant information
that bears directly and explicitly on Shoghi Effendi's intentions with respect
to the future role of Mason Remey in the development of the International
Bahá'í Council of which Mason Remey had then been but recently appointed
President by Shoghi Effendi. (announced in cablegram 2 March 1951)
Seated around the dinner table that evening in the presence of Shoghi Effendi
and Rúhíyyih Khánum were Mason Remey and the other members
of the International Bahá'í Council then residing permanently
in Haifa including Leroy Ioas, Secretary General of the Council, the two
Revell sisters and Lutfullah Hakim. My wife and Sylvia Ioas (later to be
added to the Council) made up the rest.
Shoghi Effendi opened this part of the conversation with a discussion of
the projected codification of the Kitab-i-Aqdas. My notes read as follows:
"The Guardian explained the meaning of the codification of
the Aqdas as involving its systematization extracting from the Aqdas
those portions referring to laws putting them down in order, listing
offences and punishments, etc. and then presenting this to the Governments
for approval as Bahá'í religious law. They can only be made
applicable where and when the respective Governments recognize them.
"The Bahá'í Court to be established in Haifa will operate
initially only for the Eastern world where religious law is recognized.
The present President of the International Bahá'í Council
will then become the Judge (the Guardian in an aside to Mason and with
a smile asked 'Mason are you ready to become a Judge?')
"Rúhíyyih Khánum then asked whether when the Council
became the Court, all the women would get off. The Guardian said, no
not even when the Court became elective but only when the International
House of Justice was formed."
What were the tremendous implications of these remarks by Shoghi Effendi,
implications that escaped all of us that evening and which would only become
crystal clear following his passing, five years later, and then only to
those believers who had retained an unwavering and unshakeable faith in
the indestructibility of the Covenant of Bahá'u'lláh and
the sacredness and immutability of the Will and Testament of 'Abdu'l-Bahá
and had been able to free themselves from preconceived ideas and the pernicious
conditioning to which they had been subjected by those former Hands of the
Cause and others who were convinced that the Guardianship had forever ended.
What were the tremendous implications of Shoghi Effendi's remarks, recorded
above, that all of us failed to perceive that night at table with Shoghi
Effendi?
- Whereas Shoghi Effendi had not given instructions to Mason Remey, as
its President to convene the International Bahá'í Council
into activity as a functioning body, (nor could he do so during the remaining
years of his ministry) the Council would, of necessity, become a fully
functioning and active body in the second stage of its development as the
International Court.
- We did not realize the implication of Mason Remey's appointment as the
President of the International Bahá'í Council even though the constitution
of this Institution "at long last" had been identified by
Shoghi Effendi as a permanent body in his Proclamation of 9 January 1951
and had been identified as "this first embryonic International
Institution" and had been extolled as "the
greatest event shedding lustre upon the second epoch of the Formative Age
of the Bahá'í Dispensation." And, he was to confirm
this fact when in his cablegram of 30 June 1952 he stated: "At
the World Center of the Faith, where, at long last, the machinery of its
highest institutions has been erected, and around whose most holy shrines
the supreme organs of its unfolding Order, are, in their embryonic form,
unfolding. . ."
- As this International Court would exercise jurisdiction initially
over six subordinate National Bahá'í Courts (identified by Shoghi Effendi)
who would be applying the laws of the Aqdas over adherents of the Faith
in their respective countries, and such subsidiary laws as might be required,
an interpretative function would inevitably come into play which can only
be exercised by the Guardian of the Faith. Therefore, only the Guardian
of the Faith can preside as the Chief Judge of the International Bahá'í
Court and these two terms Chief Judge and Guardian are synonymous.
- The foregoing being the case, Mason Remey could not preside as Chief
Judge over this Court while Shoghi Effendi was alive, yet Shoghi Effendi
had made as a goal the establishment of six National Courts by Ridván
1960 which, therefore, implied that he would not be living by the end of
the Ten Year Global Crusade at Ridván 1963.
- It was highly significant, therefore, and it now becomes clear why he
did so, that during the same evening Shoghi Effendi should have alluded
so clearly to the imminence of his own passing (actually taking place
five years later) that Rúhíyyih Khánum jumped up from the
dinner table and in tears rushed out of the room only returning when she
had composed herself. This allusion, oddly enough, did not fully register
upon our minds, no doubt because it seemed so improbable at the time and
even Rúhíyyih Khánum obviously dismissed it from her mind
as she does not mention it in her book about Shoghi Effendi. She was reminded
of this event in one of the four letters I have since sent to her which
are now available on the Internet.
- We had lost sight of the words of 'Abdu'l-Bahá wherein He states:
"the embryo possesses from the first all perfections . . . in one
word, all the powers but they are not visible, and become so only by
degrees." The Head of the embryonic body of the International
Bahá'í Council remains its head as it develops through its successive stages
into its full development as the Universal House of Justice. Shoghi Effendi
confirmed this fact in the question he posed to Mason Remey, quoted above.
- The Head of the International Bahá'í Council could only be the Guardian
of the Cause of God under the terms of the Will and Testament of 'Abdu'l-Bahá.
We did not perceive this fact then and only did so after the receipt of
Mason Remey's Proclamation when it became clear that by Shoghi Effendi's
appointment of Mason Remey "in his own life-time" as the Head
of this embryonic body he had appointed his successor, in a way so unexpected
by all of us who had been universally guilty of holding the obviously false
expectation that a testamentary document would be the article of appointment
and which upon our later reexamination of the terms of the Will and Testament
proved to us to be the case.
The reason why Shoghi Effendi had to obscure his appointment of a successor
in the way that he did is discussed elsewhere by the undersigned in documentation
to be found on the Internet.

Joel Bray Marangella
Third Guardian of the Bahá'í Faith