SHOGHI EFFENDI'S INTENTIONS FOR MASON REMEY'S FUTURE


My Haifa Notes of 30 November 1952 reveal the following significant information that bears directly and explicitly on Shoghi Effendi's intentions with respect to the future role of Mason Remey in the development of the International Bahá'í Council of which Mason Remey had then been but recently appointed President by Shoghi Effendi. (announced in cablegram 2 March 1951)

Seated around the dinner table that evening in the presence of Shoghi Effendi and Rúhíyyih Khánum were Mason Remey and the other members of the International Bahá'í Council then residing permanently in Haifa including Leroy Ioas, Secretary General of the Council, the two Revell sisters and Lutfullah Hakim. My wife and Sylvia Ioas (later to be added to the Council) made up the rest.

Shoghi Effendi opened this part of the conversation with a discussion of the projected codification of the Kitab-i-Aqdas. My notes read as follows:

"The Guardian explained the meaning of the codification of the Aqdas as involving its systematization – extracting from the Aqdas those portions referring to laws – putting them down in order, listing offences and punishments, etc. and then presenting this to the Governments for approval as Bahá'í religious law. They can only be made applicable where and when the respective Governments recognize them.

"The Bahá'í Court to be established in Haifa will operate initially only for the Eastern world where religious law is recognized. The present President of the International Bahá'í Council will then become the Judge (the Guardian in an aside to Mason and with a smile asked 'Mason are you ready to become a Judge?')

"Rúhíyyih Khánum then asked whether when the Council became the Court, all the women would get off. The Guardian said, no – not even when the Court became elective but only when the International House of Justice was formed."

What were the tremendous implications of these remarks by Shoghi Effendi, implications that escaped all of us that evening and which would only become crystal clear following his passing, five years later, and then only to those believers who had retained an unwavering and unshakeable faith in the indestructibility of the Covenant of Bahá'u'lláh and the sacredness and immutability of the Will and Testament of 'Abdu'l-Bahá and had been able to free themselves from preconceived ideas and the pernicious conditioning to which they had been subjected by those former Hands of the Cause and others who were convinced that the Guardianship had forever ended.

What were the tremendous implications of Shoghi Effendi's remarks, recorded above, that all of us failed to perceive that night at table with Shoghi Effendi?

The reason why Shoghi Effendi had to obscure his appointment of a successor in the way that he did is discussed elsewhere by the undersigned in documentation to be found on the Internet.



Joel Bray Marangella
Third Guardian of the Bahá'í Faith